San Francisco has a problem with homeless people, there are too damn many of them.
So they’re asking (for now) that homeowners and landlords take in some homeless people.
“This is not a new idea – it’s been floated for many years,” he told the Mail. “Particularly in San Francisco – it goes back to freedom, and the summer of love, and hippies and communal houses, with strangers crashing on your couch.”
“It’s not an unheard-of concept. But we’re not talking about flower children. Now it gets a bit absurd,” he added.
He added that such high rates of mental illness and drug addiction in the homeless community thin out the number of potential candidates to place in the housing.
“A very high percentage of San Francisco’s homeless people are homeless because they are addicted to drugs or mentally ill. So the number of candidates is going to be quite limited,” Greenberg explained.
National Propaganda Radio has its take on the causes of homelessness.
Like a broken clock that’s right twice a day they do make some correct assumptions. But the bottom line is that it was leftist liberal policies like rent control and paying people to be homeless.
And does it seem odd that those big blue California cities have the biggest gaps between rich and poor?
One would think that all filthy rich big tech millionaires and billionaires in Silicone Valley who live in these neighborhoods and those wealthy actors and producers in Hollywood who live in Beverly Hills who live in huge mansions. Like Barbra Streisand’s place.
Now just think how many homeless people could live there. And there have to be hundreds of places like this that are owned by rich progressive liberal people who vote democrat, who should only be too happy to open at least one of the their residences to the homeless. They can move into one of their other places.
But it’s their private property you say… What did you say, comrade?