Expressing a different opinion different from the orthodox Party line makes her a thought criminal. Perhaps she should be thankful she’s only being purged, someday it may be “to be shot” !
Just read some of the awful things (sarc.) she said.
“I firmly believe that Black Lives Matter, but I DO NOT agree with the coercive measures taken to get to this point across; some of which are falsified in an attempt to prove a point,” Riley wrote, according to the school’s website. “While I want to get behind BLM, I do not think people should be made to feel they have to choose black race over human race.”
“While I understand the urgency to feel compelled to advocate for black lives, what about our fellow law enforcement?” she added. “What about all others who advocate for and demand equity for all? Just because I don’t walk around with a BLM sign should not mean I am a racist.”
“The (School) Politburo Board does not even entertain the possibility that Riley might not be a racist and still question BLM, …
This whole episode stinks. A blatant violation of Principal Rileys First Amendment right of Free speech. And Lawyers are in total agreement on this. As of this writing I have not heard or read of any comment from the Vermont chapter of the A.C.L.U. Somehow I’m not surprised.
Maybe I’ll contact them and see what they have to say.
